REVIEW: “In the Orchard, Where Robots Grow” by Erin K. Wagner

Review of Erin K. Wagner, “In the Orchard, Where Robots Grow,” Luna Station Quarterly 62 (June 2025): 53-69 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Content note: Death of a parent.

It’s hard to call a post-apocalyptic SF story “cozy,” but as I read this story and reached for the right words, that’s the one I kept ending up with. It’s not “cozy” in the sense of happy and comforting but in the sense of small-scale, intimate, personal, much more about the breakdown of familial relationships than the breakdown of the robot in the orchard.

REVIEW: “The Philosophy of Weeds” by Lesley Hart Gunn

Review of Lesley Hart Gunn, “The Philosophy of Weeds,” Luna Station Quarterly 62 (June 2025): 187-189 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

“Be careful what you cultivate,” Lana’s husband warns her, but honestly, of the two of them, I’m on Lana’s side, on the side of letting the weeds grow and flourish. No matter how destructive they are in this tight, short story, they are far less destructive than what it is that her husband is cultivating.

REVIEW: “Downstairs Neighbor” by H.V. Patterson

Review of H.V. Patterson, “Downstairs Neighbor,” Luna Station Quarterly 62 (June 2025): 71-78 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Moving out and on your own is never easy, even when space and independence is what you want. Thankfully, this can be made easier with the presence of a helpful neighbor — which is exactly what the narrator in this story gets, even if it’s not quite the neighbor she might have expected! This was a fun little story.

REVIEW: “Melilot Dreams” by EC Dorgan

Review of EC Dorgan, “Melilot Dreams,” Luna Station Quarterly 62 (June 2025): 81-92 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Most post-apocalyptic stories lean heavily to the SF genre, but this one doesn’t wear that genre on its sleeve; if anything, it tends more towards horror, of a very reflective, personal, and introspective kind. We never learn much about the apocalypse other than that it was AI-driven, but quite a bit about the narrator, their life before and after, and the loneliness of trying to stay alive.

It is a deeply, deeply unhappy story.

REVIEW: “A Flame At the Edge of Darkness” by Rebecca Washburn

Review of Rebecca Washburn, “A Flame At the Edge of Darkness,” Luna Station Quarterly 61 (2025): 361-383 — Purchase online. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

The story frames itself as being about the Darkness — a phenomenon that isn’t quite natural, isn’t quite artificial — and the Flames — the young girls who are the only predators of the Darkness; but in truth it’s much more a story of love and estrangement between mother and daughter. I had some sympathy with Maggie, the mother (from whose point of view the story is told), up until her thinly veiled homophobia was revealed, as well as the way she pretended her religion was “love”, and then I lost all sympathy for her. I spent the rest of the story desperately hoping that she wouldn’t get resolution, that there wouldn’t be redemption, wouldn’t be a happy ending, because that seemed like it would just be too easy. Having reached the ending, I’m not quite sure if I’m happy with it or not.

REVIEW: “A Collections Librarian of the Slow-Flying Nautilus” by Mae Juniper Stokes

Review of Mae Juniper Stokes, “A Collections Librarian of the Slow-Flying Nautilus,” Luna Station Quarterly 61 (2025): 91-110 — Purchase online. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Content note: Book burning (not in the censorship sense, but in the literal sense. Still hurts to read about).

I regularly see my philosophical friends and colleagues asking for recommendations for SFF stories relevant to various topics that they can suggest to their students; I think there’s a good chance at some point in the future I will recommend Stokes’ story for the way it engages with the ethical implications at the intersection of resource management and cultural heritage (with a side dose of immigration and colonisation). This isn’t a topic often explored in story form, and I found this an interesting take!

REVIEW: “Canary, Canary” by Amara Mesnik

Review of Amara Mesnik, “Canary, Canary,” Luna Station Quarterly 61 (2025): 327-347 — Purchase online. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

One could describe the premise of this story as: Colonizing men get their comeuppance — and since it comes at the hands of a young woman, it’s rather satisfying. On the other hand, it could also be described as: Unbearably naive woman gets taught a lesson — and since that young woman is the same one, since Saisha only gets to be the heroine because it was her naivety that caused the problem in the first place, it’s also rather frustrating.

REVIEW: “A Hint of Sugar” by Elizabeth Rankin

Review of Elizabeth Rankin, “A Hint Sugar,” Luna Station Quarterly 61 (2025): 57-75 — Purchase online. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Content note: Dieting, calorie counting, fatphobia.

Norah is a baker whose sweet treats are under threat from the newest development in DNA modification: A new diet induced by a shot that changes how sweet things taste.

I confess, I didn’t quite get how this was supposed to work: Is the idea that after such a shot, people would stop eating sugary things because they no longer taste sweet? Why would that be the behavioral change rather than people eating way way more sugar because they could no longer taste it was sweet? (After all, I’m pretty sure sugar’s addictive qualities are not due to its taste, but do to the impact it has on the body.) My constant thoughts about this conundrum unfortunately prevented me from engaging with the story itself as I might otherwise have.