REVIEW: “For Love and Country” by Yelena Crane

Review of Yelena Crane, “For Love and Country,” Luna Station Quarterly 63 (September 2025): 145-159 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

This is fundamentally a story about being an immigrant in a dystopia, and as such it was a tough story to read (I’m an immigrant myself, but the so-called “good kind” which makes where I live only slightly less dystopian than it is for my fellow immigrants who are the “wrong kind”), but just as Eva snatches at a chance of hope, of asylum, so too I found my own hope in the story, hope that everything would turn out all right, hope that Eva would get her happy ending, hope that the author wouldn’t betray us readers by pulling the rug out from under us at the last moment, growing tentatively as I read. The balm of having the hope fulfilled was something I needed today, an otherwise tough day.

Sara L. UckelmanLeave a comment

REVIEW: “Going to Sea, Mother,” by Luscha Makortoff

Review of Luscha Makortoff, “Going to Sea, Mother,” Luna Station Quarterly 63 (September 2025): 37-49 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Content note: Suicidal ideation.

Selkie stories tend to be more difficult to pull off than stories of other mythical creatures, in part because the mythology of the selkie is so constraining: There is one dominant narrative, and I find many authors struggle to escape it. Makortoff managed to add extra layers to the typical selkie story, intertwining it with another story of desertion and loss, in a way which I ended up enjoying quite a bit.

Sara L. UckelmanLeave a comment

REVIEW: “Self-Portrait as ChatGPT” by Sarah Chin

Review of Sarah Chin, “Self-Portrait as ChatGPT,” Luna Station Quarterly 63 (September 2025): 286-290 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Content note: References to suicide.

I can teach you how to say “I’m sorry” so someone believes it. I can make you sound like you mean it, even when you don’t (p. 289).

This was a beautiful, somewhat heartbreaking story, which was even more interesting to read given that I had read a few days earlier this Guardian piece on chatfishing. It’s becoming harder and harder to imagine a future where significant portions of the population are not outsourcing a significant portion of their human interactions to a machine, and that’s both scary and sad.

Sara L. UckelmanLeave a comment

REVIEW: “Something Broken, Someone New” by Caroline Shea

Review of Caroline Shea, “Something Broken, Someone New,” Luna Station Quarterly 62 (June 2025): 15-34 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Content note: Child terminal illness.

This is a story of two forgotten children living in a forgotten airport — are they shadows? Are they ghosts? For much of the story the reader doesn’t know, and it seems like even the children themselves don’t know. Only towards the end is it revealed how they got there, why they are there, in an intimate portrayal of sibling rivalry and love. It’s a strange little story; I enjoyed it.

Sara L. UckelmanLeave a comment

REVIEW: “Oathbinder” by L. Fox

Review of L. Fox, “Oathbinder,” Luna Station Quarterly 62 (June 2025): 303-319 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

There was something about Fox’s use of language in the opening pages — how the words sort of slipped and rolled sideways — that was purely magical. The feeling of the prose translated, for me, into a feeling of the world itself, slightly strange, slightly confusing, full of depths that I definitely couldn’t quite understand. This is probably my favorite story of the entire issue.

Sara L. UckelmanLeave a comment

REVIEW: “Mother Maggie” by Rebecca Harrison

Review of Rebecca Harrison, “Mother Maggie,” Luna Station Quarterly 62 (June 2025): 127-144 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Harrison tells this story through the medium of podcast transcript [1], effectively just a dialogue between the two hosts, Tasha and Claudia. Their show appears to be a mixture of folklore, sensational stories, baking, and digressions [2]. I enjoy this sort of medium because it means there things don’t get bogged down in unnecessary description; but at times I also couldn’t really get into it for the same reasons I can’t get into actual podcasts — they’re just a bit too tedious for me. Despite the tedium, though, there was an eerie, creepy pull as this horror story developed.

[1] At least, I think it’s supposed to be a podcast, or maybe a radio show (esp. as the hosts mention their “international listeners”). However, at one point Tasha says something that indicates she’s sharing a photograph, so maybe it’s actually video transcript.

[2] If you are not already familiar with the reference half-way down p. 129, go watch this, you won’t regret it.

Sara L. UckelmanLeave a comment

REVIEW: “The Family Ghosts” by M. E. Garber

Review of M. E. Garber, “The Family Ghosts,” Luna Station Quarterly 62 (June 2025): 37-47 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

Most families are haunted to some degree by the ghosts of their ancestors, but in this story, family ghosts are so much more than that —

“We are your family, your community, your past and your future” (p. 38)

and leaving means not only losing your family but also your history.

The metaphor is obviously one for generational wealth, support, etc. (or the lack thereof!) but its obviousness didn’t detract at all from my enjoyment of the story. I always approve of a story of someone who manages to escape bondage and find freedom.

Sara L. UckelmanLeave a comment

REVIEW: “Ends and Means” by Ana Wesley

Review of Ana Wesley, “Ends and Means,” Luna Station Quarterly 62 (June 2025): 261-281 — Purchase here. Reviewed by Sara L. Uckelman.

It’s another post-apocalyptic story, two women desperately running and trying to stay safe, never sure where they will sleep, what they will eat, who will betray them next. There’s been a lot of these such stories lately, it feels like, and one thing I’ve realized lately is how few post-apocalyptic settings ever really go deep into worldbuilding. The apocalypses are rarely articulated, the enemies often feel interchangeable, the central characters — while varied and interesting in themselves — too seem like they could be swapped from one setting to another without their stories fundamentally changing.

All this to say: There’s been so many stories of this ilk in recent years that it’s now going to take something special for one to stand out for me. It took Wesley’s story a good five pages to get going, but then I finally started getting glimpse of something at least a little bit different: post-apocalyptic fantasy, rather than SF.

Sara L. UckelmanLeave a comment